Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Coffey

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Boulder County. In 1889 Henry N. Coffey brought this suit against Anthony Arnett and Mary G., his wife, to cancel sundry conveyances which apparently vested the title to the described property in the wife.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court of Boulder County. In 1889 Henry N. Coffey brought this suit against Anthony Arnett and Mary G., his wife, to cancel sundry conveyances which apparently vested the title to the described property in the wife. The bill set up that Coffey had obtained judgment against Arnett in the district court of Boulder county on September 14,1888, for $680.80 and that prior to the rendition of judgment, and "at the time when the indebtedness was incurred upon which judgment was rendered, Anthony Ar-nett was the owner of certain real property. There was no other statement in the…

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

It is universally agreed, that as against existing creditors, a debtor may not make a voluntary conveyance. To bring' the case within this well recognized principle it must be shown by both allegation and proof that the debt to which the property is said to be subject existed at the time of the conveyance, unless there be present an intention to defraud creditors, whose rights are shortly expected to arise, and whose rights may thereafter supervene. Wilcoxen v. Morgan, 2 Colo. 473; Sexton v. Wheaton, 8 Wheat. 229; Jackson v. Jackson, 91 U. S. 122.

As against Anthony Arnett it is tolerably…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Sexton v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  3. Hinde's Lessee v. LongworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Von Trotha v. BambergerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Cornell v. RadwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Homestead Mining Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. Appel Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Eggleston v. SheldonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Fox v. LipeColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API