Legal Opinion

White Sewing Machine Co. v. Gordon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1890No. 14,364PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This was a suit by the appellant against the appellee upon a bond which the complaint alleges was executed to the appellant, by the appellee, as surety of one Bush Gordon.

The appellee pleaded non est factum. The cause was tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict for the appellee, upon which the court rendered judgment.

The error assigned is, that the court erred in overruling, the motion for a new trial.

It is claimed by the appellant that the court erred in refusing to permit it to prove by Asa T. Beebe, and others, witnesses called by the appellee, on cross-examination, that *496in their opinion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Eborn v. ZimpelmanTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Tome v. Parkersburg Branch RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  4. Burdick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Huston v. SchindlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Howard v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Thompson v. FreemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Alexander v. BlackburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API