Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1933No. 4-3222PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The recent case of New York Life Insurance Company v. Farrell, 187 Ark. 984, 63 S. W. (2d) 520, decides the exact question which is controlling here. In that case the insured had two policies in the New York Life Insurance Company, each for $5,000. In the instant case there were two policies, written by the same company, each for $10,000. The opinion in the Farrell case, supra, sets out the provisions of the policies there sued on in regard to disability insurance, which read as follows:

“Whenever the company receives due proof, before default in the payment o.f premium, that the insured,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. New York Life Insurance v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance Co. v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Missouri State Life Insurance v. CaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Sanderson v. Postal Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Home Life Insurance Company v. SwaimSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API