State v. Kitowski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence relied upon by the jury was sufficient to prove the necessary elements of the crime of arson. Two elements must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in order to sustain the conviction for the crime of arson. They are: “(1) the corpus delicti; that is, a fire caused by a criminal agency; and (2) the identity of defendant as the one responsible for the fire.” Curtis, Law of Arson, p. 526, sec. 486; see also State v. Janasky (1950), 258 Wis. 182, 45 N. W. 2d 78. On this appeal defendant contends that neither of these elements have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. WatersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Schwantes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BerbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Bethards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. DiMaggioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. SpringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.