Legal Opinion

State v. Spring

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1970No. State 81PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The first contention concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to convict. In the last week of March, 1966, Spring and a Mrs. Marlene Strege, who were not married, came to Necedah from Dallas, Texas. They had very little money and their car had broken down, but Mrs. Strege’s father allowed Spring to use his 1955 Dodge, which had a white top and a pinkish faded old body and he permitted them to live in a house which he owned. Spring obtained employment as a welder in nearby New Lisbon, and on April 7th he received an advance on his wages in the form of a check for $25 which he cashed at the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wold v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rudolph v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. CasselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Reichhoff v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API