Bethards v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two principal issues are raised on this review. They are:
1. Was there sufficient credible evidence to convict defendant of attempted burglary?
2. Was it error to instruct on parties to a crime when that statutory provision was not specifically mentioned in the information filed against the defendant?
This court has often stated that before it will reverse a conviction because of insufficiency of the evidence,
“. . . the evidence when considered most favorably to the state and the conviction must be so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. DombrowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. DammsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Holland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CydzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Nicholas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Lampkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.