Legal Opinion
Cupps & Garrison, LLC v. Rhiel (In Re Two Gales, Inc.)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 14, 2011No. BAP 10-8063, 10-8064, 10-8079PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARILYN SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Judge.
After the debtor’s chapter 11 case was converted to a case under chapter 7, the bankruptcy court entered orders granting fees to counsel for Susan Rhiel, the chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”), denying the fees requested by Cupps & Garrison, LLC (“C & G”), debtor’s chapter 11 counsel, and requiring C & G to disgorge its pre-petition retainer so that the administrative expenses from the chapter 7 case could be paid. C & G has appealed those orders.
I. ISSUES ON APPEAL
The issues presented in these appeals are: Whether the bankruptcy court misapplied 11…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. Kirkpatrick & LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- In Re McLean Wine Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Cupps & Garrison, LLC v. Rhiel (In Re Two Gales, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- David A. Mucklow v. William T. Dunn, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- In re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.