Legal Opinion

United States v. Shults

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 26, 1979No. CM 437627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

THORNOCK, Judge:

In a bench trial and pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of two specifications each of possession and sale of marihuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence.

As the single error on appeal, appellant asserts that the military judge erred by not conducting an adequate providence inquiry. He urges that the judge should have inquired more fully into the possibility of an entrapment defense. We have carefully…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. HebertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. HintonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. YoungU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BeltranU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  2. United States v. MeyersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. DejongU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. FaheyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API