Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 22, 1975No. SPCM 11356PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

DeFORD, Judge:

At trial by special court-martial, the appellant pleaded guilty and was found guilty by military judge alone, of three specifications alleging the wrongful sale of marijuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) (10 U.S.C. § 934).

The appellant through counsel alleges as error among others that: (1) the appellant’s plea of guilty to the charge and its three specifications was improvident as the appellant was the victim of an impermissible government entrapment; (2) the appellant’s plea of guilty was improvidently entered as the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. James C. SpiveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. HebertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  2. United States v. BeltranU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. MeyersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. ShultsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. DejongU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API