Legal Opinion

Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v. Pope & Talbot Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1918No. Civ. No. 1802PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Action to condemn a right of way for a canal. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled and defendant answered; a jury was waived, the cause was tried by the court, and plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant appeals on the judgment-roll alone.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of this state and was incorporated "for the purpose of distributing, supplying, and delivering water for irrigation purposes, and for domestic use, to the stockholders of said corporation, and to the owners of its capital stock, and to that end to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Reed v. GoldneckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Amador Queen Mining Co. v. DewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  4. University of Southern California v. RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API