Legal Opinion

City of Brownsville v. Salazar

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 29, 1986No. 13-85-278-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

This is an appeal from an award of overtime pay to appellee while in the employ of the City of Brownsville (the City). Appel-lee was awarded a judgment of $33,424.45, together with interest, pursuant to the Firemen & Policemen Civil Service Act. 1

Appellant brings two points of error, claiming that the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction over the subject matter, and that the trial court erred in holding that appellee’s “on-call” status entitled him to overtime pay.

No findings of fact or conclusions of law were filed or properly requested. Where findings of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kierstead v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Thompson v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Privitt v. City of Irving, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tijerina v. City of TylerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Dallas v. Spainhouer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Harrison v. City of Victoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  4. Eckles v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. City of Dallas v. Spainhouer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API