Legal Opinion

Eckles v. City of Lubbock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1992No. 07-91-0266-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellants Harold Eckles, James Dean, and James Vaughn bring this appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment. The judgment arises from a suit filed by them against appellees, the City of Lubbock and the Lubbock Fire Department. In the suit, appellants contend they were entitled to back pay at overtime rates for time they were required to be in an on-call status between April 30, 1984 and September 1, 1987. During that period, they allege, their on-call status was in effect seven *864days a week, twenty-four hours a day, excluding regular duty hours, sick days, training periods,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Lubbock v. Eckles, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API