Legal Opinion
Worley v. Mundell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 26, 1926No. 16201PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREAD GILL, C.
Plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and they will be referred to bere as they appeared there. C. P. Worley was sheriff and G. T. Shook, was undersheriff of Garvin county. They had levied an execution or order of sale, issued out of the district court of Caddo county, upon an oil and gas lease on the S. E. % of sec. 20 T 1. N., R. 3 W. Garvin county, which appears of record in the name of J. E. Trimmer, and were advertising the same for sale as property attached at the order of the Colony Mercantile Company, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wallace v. BullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Fast v. Rogers, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Harris v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Love v. CavettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Crist v. CosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weaver v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Farmers State Bank of Newkirk v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Miller v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Wilson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Mundell v. Colony Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.