Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Giles

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

■FROM MONTGOMERY. Appeal in error from tbe Circuit Court of Montgomery County. 13. D. Bell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

Plaintiff below brought this suit to recover damages for an assault and battery inflicted upon him by the defendant, Daniel. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against the defendant for $500,00. Daniel appealed, and has assigned errors. The Court properly' charged the jury that no words, or insults, or opprobrious epithets, would justify an assault. It is well settled, however, that any provocation calculated to heat the blood or arouse the passion of a reasonable man, if offered at the time of the assault, or so recently before as to become a part of the res gestae, is admissible…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. BatchlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Arnold v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Evans v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  4. Gregory v. SusongTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. James & Mary McCain v. Cary VaughnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API