Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Wiley

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 19, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

This is an action for damages growing out of fisticuffs between the parties on July 7, 1953 immediately following and accompanied by, abusive language and provocative charges. The plaintiff sued in separate counts for compensatory and punitive damages in the sum of $10,000. The jury returned a verdict for $25 and costs which the court approved in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff Pascal Arnold has appealed and assigned as error that the verdict allows nothing for loss of time, said to amount to $384, for pain and suffering endured as the result of the assault or for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Finchem v. OmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Paragon Refining Co. v. Lee Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Daniel v. GilesTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Evans v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Tevis v. TevisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Smythe v. Easy Quick Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. James & Mary McCain v. Cary VaughnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. McNeal v. OwensDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API