Legal Opinion

State v. Dart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1988No. M360982, M454385, M823445, M824954, M815895, M743776, M830887, M829232, M460798, M765528 CA A44457-A44459, A44461-A44463, A44466-A44469 SC S34505PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We address the issue whether the results of breath tests to determine blood alcohol content (BAC) were properly-excluded by the district court judge because the breath alcohol testing instruments allegedly were not properly certified according to state law. The trial court granted defendants’ motions to suppress 1 because the court concluded that the instruments were not properly certified. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. State v. Dart, 87 Or App 124, 741 P2d 538 (1987). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Defendants were charged with driving under the influence of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FogleOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. City of Salem v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. DartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. SchottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. SchottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API