Legal Opinion

State v. Dart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 1987No. M360982; CA A44457 (Control); M454385; CA A44458; M823445; CA A44459; M824954; CA AA44461; M815895; CA A44462; M743776; CA A44463; M830887; CA A44466; M829232; CA A44467; M460798; CA A44468; M765528; CA A44469PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

These are consolidated appeals in which the state seeks reversal of the trial court’s orders suppressing evidence of Intoxilyzer test results against defendants, who are charged with DULL Defendants advance a number of arguments for sustaining the orders, the thrust of which is that the Intox-ilyzer Model 4011A used by the state does not comply with and was not approved for use in accordance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. None of those arguments has merit. We hold that Intoxilyzer Model 4011A and the method by which its use was authorized satisfy all requirements of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DartOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API