Legal Opinion

Schenectady Savings Bank v. Ashton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Kirk, J.:

The assumption of the mortgage debt by the grantee of mortgaged premises does not release the mortgagor from his obligation upon the bond secured by the mortgage. The liability of the obligor remains for the deficiency, the amount of which can be determined only after the sale of the mortgaged premises. The obligor desires naturally that he should be relieved from this liability. He can be so relieved by a sale of the premises or by an instrument executed by the mortgagee or his assigns releasing him from his personal liability upon the bond. Such release may be given and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Marsh v. PikeNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  3. Johnson v. . ZinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Conover v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kress v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Kress v. Central Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Albany Exchange Savings Bank v. WinneNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Silver v. Park-Lex Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Schenectady Savings Bank v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API