Legal Opinion

Wieland v. Kobick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sheldon

This was an action of ejectment, for the recovery of a certain lot of land in an addition to Chicago. There was recovery by the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed.

On the trial in the court below there was introduced in evidence, in defence, a deed from the plaintiff to Emily C. Cummings, in which it is recited that “Margaretha David, (the plaintiff,) unmarried, and of age,” for $3500 conveys and quitclaims to Emily C. Cummings the property in question, and a deed from Emily C. Cummings to Anna C. Haas, one of the defendants. The plaintiff then introduced evidence to prove that at the date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conrad v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Brown v. McCuneThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
  3. Studwell v. . ShapterNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Gilson v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keal v. RhydderckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rice v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cobbey v. BuchananNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Iverson v. Scholl, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Whitman v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API