Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Lane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal ■court of Stillwater.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This is an action in the nature of assumpsit, in which the plaintiffs seek to recover the reasonable value of certain merchandise sold and delivered to defendant. It was tried by the municipal court, without a jury. ■ The court finds that, in 1874, plaintiffs sold and delivered to defendant, then an infant, merchandise (not necessaries) of the value of $214.81, upon which there remains unpaid a balance of $131.81; that defendant was then engaged in business in his own name and for his own benefit, holding himself out to be of age, and that, on the faith of such holding out, the goods,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Studwell v. . ShapterNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Gilson v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rice v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Johnson v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Alt v. BanholzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Wold v. WoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Alt v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API