Dunn v. Dunn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
February 26, 1878, one Mary A. King-man owned the premises here in question. It was found that she was then, and long prior thereto had been, insane, incompetent to transact business or to understand the nature of her acts, and entirely without understanding, and continued to be in such mental condition up to the time of her death in 1886. She had not been judicially declared of unsound mind, and had no guardian.
On the date first mentioned one Garwood loaned to Mary A. Kingman four hundred dollars, and took from her a mortgage upon the property mentioned to secure the same. On the eleventh…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- OC Interior Services, LLC v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.