Legal Opinion

Decker v. Fair

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Collins (Joseph H.), J. Case by John Decker against Cleland Fair for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife. From an order granting a new trial unless plaintiff remit all of the verdict in excess of $1,000, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant for damages for alienating the affections of the wife of plaintiff. The case was tried', before a jury who returned a verdict for $3,500.. Afterwards defendant made a motion for a new trial,, and the judge filed an order granting a new trial unless the plaintiff within 20 days would remit all in excess, of $1,000. Plaintiff did not remit and seeks to have this court review the case by writ of error.

After the case reached this court the defendant moved to dismiss the writ of error, claiming this court. Could not review the action of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Reynolds v. Newaygo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Zeilman v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DabollMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Carton v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benmark v. SteffenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Leary v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. J. L. Hudson Co. v. BarnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Graeger v. HagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API