Aetna Securities Co. v. Sickels
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.
— The appellants, by the institution of independent proceedings in equity, sought relief from an alleged default judgment. After a trial of the issues relief was denied and they now assign error in this court. A decision of the questions presented requires a review of the litigation in which the present suit has its origin.
In 1936 Anna Sickels, Lucia H. Sickels, Catherine A. Sickels and Laura Sickels, believing that they had been defrauded into the execution of various contracts for the purchase of a large amount of real estate in Lake County, Indiana, by Xen McNair, Aetna Securities Company,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fisk v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Sickels v. Aetna Securities Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Cox v. PruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- State Ex Rel. Surprise v. Porter Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Indiana State Board of Medical Registration & Examination v. PickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Marriage of RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ed Martin Ford Co., Inc. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Coulas v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- GILKISON v. DarlingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. PowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.