Legal Opinion
City of Hammond v. DARLINGTON
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1959No. 29,877PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.
This is an action to recover attorneys’ fees for legal services performed by a taxpayer attorney for legal services performed by him, which services have prevented payment of 124 judgments taken against the City of Hammond in the sum of $950,000. A bond issue for the payment of these judgments had been authorized and notice thereof issued. Appellee obtained an injunction against said bond issue and against the payment of judgments on the ground of fraud and collusion in their procurement.
*539The judgment in that ease was appealed to the Appellate Court. Gilkison et al. v. Darlington (1952), 123…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Stanton v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Indianapolis Dairymen's Co-Op. Inc. v. BottemaIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Greensburg Local 761 Printing Specialities v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.