Legal Opinion

State v. Esparza

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 21, 2006No. 55858-7-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 Convictions for attempted robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree violate double jeopardy if, in order to establish the attempted robbery conviction, the State is required to prove facts sufficient to sustain the assault conviction. Likewise, the same two crimes merge for double jeopardy purposes if proof of the assault is necessary to elevate the attempted robbery conviction. Here, Jamar Beaver was convicted of attempted robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, where the substantial step toward the robbery was not necessarily the assault. Because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. KierWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re BorreroWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of BorreroWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API