State v. Knight

¶1 Amanda Christine Knight appeals two convictions for second degree assault against two victims, JS1 and Charlene Sanders, (Counts III and V) during a home invasion robbery2; she also appeals her sentences, arguing that they were based on an incorrect offender score. Knight argues that there was insufficient evidence to support these convictions and that they constitute double *941jeopardy because (1) the jury instructions were ambiguous, and (2) the assaults should have merged with her first degree robbery convictions committed against the same two victims (Counts IV3 and II). She also asks us…