Coward v. Wellmont Health System
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY
**354 In Wyatt v. McDermott , 283 Va. 685 , 725 S.E.2d 555 (2012), this Court recognized for the first time the tort of intentional interference with parental rights. The present case tests the limits of this theory of tort liability. The circuit court sustained several demurrers to Samantha Coward's complaint, 1 finding that the allegations did not constitute a viable claim as a matter of law. We agree. Our holding in Wyatt and the context in which we offered it do not extend to the factual allegations against the defendants presently on appeal.
I
Coward…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wahi v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- A.H. v. Church of God in Christ, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Parker v. Carilion ClinicSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Sweely Holdings, LLC v. Suntrust BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Anderson v. DillmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- A.H. v. Church of God in Christ, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2019
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.