Legal Opinion
Arons v. Donovan
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 29, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-4468(JCL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint for mootness, for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will: deny defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint as moot; grant in part and deny in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a cause of action; decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dickinson v. Cosmos Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Acosta v. Democratic City Comm.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Arons v. New Jersey NetworkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- MAZO v. WAYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021