Legal Opinion

Jimmy Doyle Hindman v. Paul Healy

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 16, 2008No. 07-12931UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant Jimmy Doyle Hindman appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se complaint alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He brought suit against Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agent Paul Healy, FBI agent Jeffery Dowdy, FBI Analyst Heather Seubert, Deputy Randy King of the Limestone Co. Police Department, Court Reporter Christina Decker, and five other individuals alleging violations of his First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Irving v. PAE Government Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
  2. Alfred David Hardy v. United States Middle District, et al.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2026
  3. Coxon v. United States AttorneysDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  4. Hillman v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  5. Jones v. United States Of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API