Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1910No. Civ. No. 840PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a motion to change and modify the judgment upon the findings and conclusions of law based thereon. Leon F. Moss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to quiet title to two certain lots of real estate in the city of Los Angeles.

The complaint is in the usual form. The defendant answered denying that plaintiff was the owner of the lots, or had any right, title, or interest therein; and further alleged that he was the owner in fee of the same under and by virtue of deeds made, executed and delivered to him by the board of public works of the city of Los Angeles pursuant to certain proceedings had and taken by said board for the opening of Jefferson street in said city under and in accordance with the provisions of what is known as the ‘…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coyle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Ellis v. WitmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Meadow Valley Mining Co. v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chapin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Batte v. BandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Eagle Electric Mfg. Co. v. KeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Hindle v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API