Legal Opinion

Suggs v. Williamson Truck Lines

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1960No. 243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.

In the hearing below the plaintiff excepted only to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the signing of the judgment, in his notice of appeal to this Court.

The plaintiff, however, concedes in his brief that the findings of fact are supported by the evidence. But he contends that the conclusions of law are not supported by the findings of fact. Therefore, we have before us nothing more than an exception to the judgment. Such an exception presents only these questions: (1) Do the facts found support the judgment and (2) does any error of law appear upon the face of the record?…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Brown v. L. H. Bottoms Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Newsome v. SurrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Dellinger v. BollingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Watkins v. MurrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Smith v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT & LIBERTY MUT. INS.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. L. & A. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. McCharenMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Barrington v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API