Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Rutherford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County.— P. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

In the year 1897 one Frederick Volmer made and published his last will 'and testament, which contained the following provisions:

“I give, devise, and bequeath all the residue of my property, real and personal and mixed, to my nieces, Lula D. Rutherford, wife of J. R. Rutherford, and Josephine Hampe, to their sole and separate use free from the debts, contracts, control, or marital rights of the said J. R. Rutherford, or of any said husband either of said nieces shall have hereafter; said nieces to have the use and benefit of said property, half to each, for and during their natural lives and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ridley v. HallidayTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wilson v. BogleTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Land Co. v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Parker v. PetersTennessee Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bransford Realty Co. v. AndrewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Holt v. HamlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McKnight v. McKnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Chambers v. PrestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Fehringer v. FehringerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API