Legal Opinion

Bethurum v. Holland

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 26, 1989No. 07-89-0066-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

George Bethurum and wife, Shirley Be-thurum, perfected this appeal from a summary judgment decreeing that their suit filed against John P. Holland and other named defendants is dismissed with prejudice to refile the same, and that all relief not expressly granted is denied. Three months after the transcript was filed in the appellate court, 1 Holland and the other defendants moved for, and the Bethurums opposed, a dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction because the summary judgment did not dispose of all the issues in the suit. Upon the rationale expressed,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Torres v. Western Casualty and Surety CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Welch v. McDougal, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
  4. Buffalo Royalty Corp. v. Enron Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. Walker Sand, Inc. v. Baytown Asphalt Materials, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API