Baldwin v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

COUNTISS, Justice.

This is a suit by an insured against his insurer to recover damages incurred when the insurer refused to defend a claim alleg edly covered by the insurance policy. The insured, appellant Charles D. Baldwin, appealing from a summary judgment granted to the insurer, appellee Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, contends by three points of error argued collectively that (1) the claim was covered by the policy, (2) he was entitled to be reimbursed for paying the claim, and (3) his petition stated a cause of action. We affirm.

Baldwin owns a trucking company. Aet-na sold him an…