Legal Opinion

Romweber v. Martin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1972No. 71-630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

The question presented here is an interpretation of R. C. 2105.18.

Appellants contend that. (1) presumptions of legitimacy arising from the marriage of a man to a pregnant woman do not pertain to rights of inheritance and heir-ship and (2) that before such rights of inheritance accrue there must be an acknowledgment of paternity as provided for in R. C. 2105.18.* These contentions are contrary to the clear and unambiguous language and judicial interpretations of the statute. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Prior to 1785, under the common law of England there could be no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garner v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. LaRoche v. LaRocheOhio Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. RosenOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Zaperach v. BeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Hall v. RosenOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API