Legal Opinion

LaRoche v. LaRoche

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal: Court of Appeals for Belmont county.

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

The cases of Carl S. LaRoche, plaintiff, against William F. LaRoche, defendant, and Carl S. LaRoche, plaintiff, against Louis F. La-Roche et al., defendants, were actions in partition filed concurrently on the 26th day of September, 1916, in the court of common pleas of this county. *244In the first case the plaintiff seeks the partition of lots numbered 19 and 73 in Harris’ addition to the city of Bellaire. In the second action partition is sought of certain- real estate of which John La-Roche, Jr., died seized. To each petition an answer was filed denying that the plaintiff had any right, title…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. State v. RomaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Hall v. Heirs of WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  5. Camp v. CronkrightNew York Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Romweber v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hudson v. KellermannOhio Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Spencer v. City of SpokaneDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API