State v. Mims
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
ST. PAUL, J.
Defendant was convicted of unlawfully manufacturing whisky for sale for beverage purposes, and was fined $500 and 60 days in jail, and 12 months additional if the fine be not paid. He appeals to this court.
The record contains but one bill of exception, to wit, to a refusal of the district judge to exclude certain evidence obtained by search and seizure made without a search warrant.
The bill is without merit. In Shreveport v. Marx, 148 La. 31, 86 South. 602, and again in State v. Fleckinger, 152 La. 337, 93 South. 115, this court held that evidence otherwise…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Shreveport v. MarxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- State v. FleckingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Nolan v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- State v. EddinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.