Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1923No. 26002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ST. PAUL, X

The defendants were severally convicted of manufacturing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. They have reserved three bills of exception all of like ten- or and effect, except that the third bill raises a question of sufficiency of the evidence to convict. With this last, however, this court has no concern, as it has no jurisdiction to review facts bearing directly on the guilt or innocence of the accused.

For the rest, the complaint is that the trial judge received the testimony of one who admitted that he was a member of a raiding party, who entered defendants’ premises…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. MarxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. State v. FleckingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Nolan v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. State v. CreelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. State v. EddinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. State v. ShottsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API