State v. Yoder
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by tbe grand jury of Becker county for tbe crime of bigamy. Defendant demurred to tbe indictment, -and-for tbe purposes of tbe demurrer only tbe facts were stipulated. Tbe demurrer was overruled, Taylor, L, .and at-the request of defendant' the case was certified to.this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant was indicted and thereby charged by the grand jury of Becker county with the crime of bigamy. Upon arraignment he interposed a general demurrer to the indictment. At the hearing of the demúrter the' parties stipulated to certain facts for the consideration of the court in ruling upon the question presented. The demurrer was overruled, and the court certified the question arising from the facts to this court for final determination. The facts, as so agreed upon, are as follows:
In January, 1908, defendant and Inga Marie Yoder, residents- and domiciled in the state of North Dakota,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Eaton v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- McLennan v. McLennanOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Smith v. FifeWashington Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.