Legal Opinion

North River Insurance v. ACE American Reinsurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 15, 2004No. Docket No. 02-7902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

ACE American Reinsurance Company (“ACE”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to ap-pellees, North River Insurance Company and International Insurance Company (collectively “North River”), in a lawsuit arising out of a reinsurance bill dispute between the parties. The district court granted summary judgment for North River and ordered ACE to pay the disputed bill, reasoning that the deferential follow-the-fortunes2 doctrine required ACE to accept North River’s allocation. The court also ordered ACE to pay, pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5001,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Christiania General Insurance Corporation of New York v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. Seven Provinces InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. OneBeacon Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. The North River Insurance Company v. Ace American Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API