Matikas v. University of Dayton

Fain, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Theodore Matikas appeals from a summary judgment rendered against him on his claims relating to the termination of his employment. The trial court found that Matikas failed to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact with regard to any of his claims. We agree. From the evidence submitted by both parties, when viewed in a light most favorable to Matikas, no reasonable- finder of fact could conclude otherwise than that defendant-appellee University of Dayton acted in accordance with its established policies in concluding that…