Legal Opinion

Liqui-Box Corp. v. Reid Valve Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 87-2098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

We are presently faced with a motion to dismiss on the basis of res judicata in this patent infringement case. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we deny the motion.

Plaintiff, Liqui-Box Corporation (Liqui-Box), is the holder of U.S. patent number design 270,136. This patent is for the ornamental design of a plastic container for liquids. Complaint, para. 4. This patent, issued in August 1983, is in force for fourteen years.

Liqui-Box manufactures, sells and distributes five gallon, refillable, plastic water-cooler bottles based on patent number…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. La Republica ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Moss v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Kimball v. SchwartzDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. Argentine RepublicDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API