Legal Opinion
Kimball v. Schwartz
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 13, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-1811PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANSMANN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss or Transfer filed by Defendant Gerald Schwartz. Plaintiff L. Robert Kimball, t/d/b/a L. Robert Kimball & Associates (“Kimball”), brought this action alleging that Defendant Schwartz, during this course of his employment with Kim-ball, spent a great deal of his time promoting or marketing the interests of other companies, including some of .Kimball’s competitors. For the reasons discussed below, we hereby deny Defendant’s Motion.
Plaintiff resides in Pennsylvania, maintaining a place of business in Ebensburg.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Elbeco Inc. v. Estrella De Plato, Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hammond v. Butler, Means, Evins & BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Leung v. NunesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. O'LEARY PAINT CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Dinterman v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.