Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States Office of Personnel Management
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 26, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-5235PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 26th day of February 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. No. 1), Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Staying Discovery and to Quash Subpoena (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiffs responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 16 & 39), and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 25), Plaintiffs response (Doc. No. 29), Defendant’s reply (Doc. No. 32), and Plaintiffs sur-reply (Doc. No. 37), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED.
2. Defendant’s Motion for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Doe v. United Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Gonzalez v. Blue Cross Blue Shield AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Pellicano v. The Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020