People v. Tassiello
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
1 ‘ Language which might be permitted to counsel in summing up a civil action cannot with propriety be used by a public prosecutor, who is a quasi-judicial officer, representing the People of the state, and presumed to act impartially in the interest only of justice.” (People v. Fielding, 158 N. Y. 542, 547.) That pronouncement by this court is declaratory of the simple principle of fairness which was decisive in the cited case and pervades those rules which govern the administration of criminal law. In the case we now review that principle again becomes decisive.
Briefly, as to facts: The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- People v. LevanNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- People v. . ConrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- People v. MalkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. PapernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. AliceaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. LovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.