Legal Opinion

People v. Savvides

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1956PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

Convicted of the crime of feloniously possessing a narcotic drug with intent to sell (Penal Law, § 1751), defendant seeks a reversal on the ground that the principal witness against him testified falsely, to the knowledge of the prosecutor who stood by in silence.

The relevant facts are briefly stated. Arthur Mantzinos, apprehended while picking up a quantity of marijuana from a locker in a New York City bus terminal, implicated defendant, *556Savva Savvides, as the one from whom he had obtained the narcotic drug. When Mantzinos pleaded guilty to the first count of the indictment, felonious…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MleczkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. People v. . CreasyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API