Legal Opinion

Cockrum v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1918No. 9085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Replevin by Reas E. Cockrum against Hugh Johnston. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

'Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

This was an action in replevin by plaintiff in error, Reas E. Cockrum against defendant in error, Hugh Johnston, to recover certain personal property from him. Plaintiff in error alleged that he was .the owner of and entitled to the immediate possession of the personal property consisting of farming implements and stock and some feed standing in the field, of the aggregate value of $1,085 (specifically describing and valuing each animal and article separately) ; that the defendant wrongfully took possession of all of said property from plaintiff, and unlawfully detains…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. O'Brien v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ranney-Alton Mercantile Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Love v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodwin v. ShiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API