Legal Opinion
Goodwin v. Shi
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 1935No. 24086PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action in replevin instituted in the district court of Garvin county, by the defendants in error A. H. Shi and A. A. Forrest, copartners, against A. II. Land, in which suit the plaintiff in error, S. J. Goodwin, filed his petition in intervention.
For convenience the parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the court below.
Plaintiffs brought this suit in replevin for the recovery of possession of a certain Chevrolet automobile and to establish and enforce a lien which they claimed to have for labor performed and material furnished on said automobile belonging to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Bank of Stockham v. Bernhard-WeinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Milliken v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Porter v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Sunshine Oil Co. v. ChantrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Cooke v. Southwest Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Producers Investment Co. v. ColvertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940