Walker v. Bartlesville State Bank

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

At the outset of this case the court is confronted with the proposition raised by plaintiff in its brief that the brief of the defendant is fatally defective for failure to comply with rule 26 of this court (47 Okla. X), and plaintiff asks that this court disregard the brief of defendant and sustain the action of the trial court for failure of defendant to comply with said rule 26. While the brier of the defendant is subject to the criticism directed against it, yet it sufficiently presents to this court the question of whether the trial court erred a-s a matter of law in…