Lilly v. Lilly, Bogardus & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hatch, J., entered September 8, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial before the court, a jury being waived, in an action on, contract.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
On the 4th day of September, 1901, J. E. Lilly and Frances Lilly, his sister, were copartners under the firm name of J. B. Lilly & Co., and were engaged in business at Dawson, Yukon territory. As such firm, they bring this action against Lilly, Bogardus & Co., a corporation, organized under the laws of this state, having its principal place of business at Seattle. The complaint avers, that on the date above named the defendant, through its duly authorized agent, Charles H. Lilly, its president, sold to plaintiffs, at Dawson, fifty tons, of hay and fifty tons of oats, and, as part of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Cockburn v. Ashland Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Johnson v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Campbellsville Lumber Co. v. Bradlee & WigginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keen v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Hill's, Inc. v. William B. Kessler, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Baker v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hill's, Inc. v. William B. Kessler, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952